Loading News Article...
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
Lawyer Willis Otieno has sharply criticised Kenya's long-serving politicians, accusing them of holding power for decades without delivering tangible development or addressing critical national challenges.
Nairobi, Kenya – Prominent lawyer and political commentator Willis Otieno has ignited a national debate by lambasting Kenya's long-serving politicians, whom he refers to as 'legacy politicians,' for their extended tenures in office that he argues have yielded little meaningful change for ordinary citizens. Speaking on Monday, October 13, 2025, Otieno questioned the legitimacy of veteran leaders who continue to seek public office despite what he views as a consistent failure to tackle the nation's most pressing issues.
Otieno's critique highlighted a cumulative period of over 200 years in power among these politicians, encompassing ministerial seats, parliamentary terms, governorships, Cabinet positions, and other senior public offices. He asserted that this extensive period represents "two centuries of opportunity. Two centuries of speeches. Two centuries of failure."
The discussion around the longevity of political careers in Kenya is not new. While presidential terms are constitutionally limited to two five-year terms, first introduced in 1992 and reaffirmed in the 2010 Constitution, other elective positions like Members of Parliament (MPs) and Senators do not have such restrictions. This has allowed some individuals to serve multiple terms, with some MPs serving five or more terms.
Kenya's political landscape has historically been shaped by powerful figures, with debates often revolving around 'dynasties' and the influence of long-standing political families. Critics argue that this perpetuates a cycle where experienced politicians, rather than new leaders, dominate the political arena. However, some long-serving politicians attribute their re-election success to factors such as development track records, accessibility, and effective utilisation of funds like the National Government Constituency Development Fund (NG-CDF).
The Kenyan Constitution outlines a five-year term for elected officials, including the President, Members of Parliament, and County Assembly members. However, the absence of term limits for legislative roles beyond the presidency and governorships means that politicians can theoretically serve indefinitely if re-elected. This contrasts with the two-term limit for governors, though some counties have seen governors re-elected for a second term.
Otieno has previously criticised the current administration, accusing State House of becoming a "hub of corruption and backroom deals." He has also argued that it is challenging to prosecute corrupt state officials in Kenya, suggesting that those who embezzle public funds often end up in powerful positions rather than facing justice.
Otieno's statements resonate with a segment of the Kenyan public frustrated by perceived political stagnation and corruption. He highlighted the struggling healthcare and education systems as evidence of leadership failures, noting that hospitals lack medicine, equipment, and staff, while the education system is burdened by poor planning and underfunding.
He further lamented the high cost of living, which he believes leaves many Kenyans struggling while leaders enjoy luxury, shielded from the consequences of their governance. Otieno has consistently called for a rejection of 'legacy politicians,' urging youth to demand new, accountable leadership.
The continued dominance of long-serving politicians, without a demonstrable record of progress, poses several risks to Kenya's development. These include the potential for institutionalised corruption, a lack of fresh perspectives in governance, and growing public disillusionment. Otieno has warned that unchecked greed and disregard for citizens could lead to social unrest.
While Otieno's criticisms are sharp, the exact definition of a "legacy politician" and the specific individuals he refers to remain open to interpretation. The cumulative 200-year figure, while impactful, is a broad aggregation across various offices and individuals. There is also an ongoing debate about whether experience gained over a long tenure is inherently detrimental or if it can be leveraged for effective governance, provided there is accountability.
Otieno's remarks, made on Monday, October 13, 2025, are likely to fuel ongoing public discourse ahead of future elections. With general elections constitutionally mandated every five years, the next major electoral cycle is anticipated in 2027.
Observers will be watching for how Otieno's strong statements influence public opinion and political discourse, particularly among younger voters. The response from the 'legacy politicians' themselves, and whether there will be any concrete policy discussions or reforms addressing concerns about political longevity and accountability, will be key developments to monitor. The ongoing efforts to combat corruption and improve public service delivery will also remain under scrutiny.