Loading News Article...
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
/
/
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
Defence Cabinet Secretary Soipan Tuya's repeated absence from Senate summons has drawn sharp criticism from senators, particularly Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna, who are demanding accountability on the ongoing Kenya Defence Forces (KDF) recruitment exercise.
Nairobi, Kenya – Defence Cabinet Secretary Soipan Tuya faced renewed criticism from senators on Wednesday, October 1, 2025, after she failed to appear before the Senate for a scheduled session. This marks the third time CS Tuya has skipped a Senate appearance, prompting strong reactions from lawmakers, including Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna.
Senator Sifuna expressed his profound frustration, stating that he was awaiting her appearance to address concerns regarding the ongoing Kenya Defence Forces (KDF) recruitment process. He highlighted that despite letters and press conferences by Nairobi legislators, the Ministry of Defence has not adequately responded to their queries.
Former Head of Government Delivery Unit, Peter Mbae, lauded the senators' efforts to hold government officials accountable. In a statement on his Facebook page on Wednesday, October 1, 2025, Mbae specifically commended Senator Sifuna's firm stance following CS Tuya's absence. Mbae, who resigned from his government position in January 2025 citing frustrations, emphasised the need for such robust representation from senators.
The current controversy stems from the KDF's nationwide recruitment drive, which commenced in October 2025. Nairobi Members of Parliament, led by Senator Sifuna, have accused the Ministry of Defence of discriminating against Nairobi residents by allocating only three recruitment centres for the entire city, unlike other counties where recruitment is conducted at the sub-county level. They argue that this consolidation creates a logistical nightmare and could disadvantage Nairobi youth.
Kakamega Senator Boni Khalwale also raised serious allegations during the Senate sitting on October 1, 2025, claiming that KDF recruitment slots were being sold for as much as KSh 400,000. He recounted an instance where an elderly man sought his help to secure a slot for his child, offering a bull worth KSh 250,000 and requesting an additional KSh 150,000 to meet the alleged asking price.
The KDF recruitment process is governed by constitutional principles of fairness and non-discrimination. Senators are exercising their oversight role to ensure transparency and accountability in government operations, including military recruitment. The repeated absence of a Cabinet Secretary from Senate summons raises questions about adherence to parliamentary protocols and the Executive's accountability to the Legislature.
The continued standoff between the Senate and the Ministry of Defence could undermine public trust in the KDF recruitment process and government accountability. Allegations of corruption in recruitment, if unaddressed, could compromise the integrity of the armed forces and fuel public discontent. Furthermore, the threat of a censure motion against a Cabinet Secretary highlights potential friction between the Executive and Legislative arms of government.
The specific reasons for CS Tuya's repeated absences beyond the stated security meeting remain unclear. The Ministry of Defence has yet to issue a comprehensive public statement addressing the senators' concerns regarding recruitment centres and allegations of bribery.
The next steps by the Senate, particularly regarding the threatened censure motion against CS Tuya, will be crucial. Public response to the allegations of corruption in KDF recruitment and any subsequent investigations will also be important to monitor. The Ministry of Defence's official response to the senators' demands is highly anticipated.
Previous instances of Cabinet Secretaries being summoned by parliamentary committees, parliamentary oversight of government appointments and expenditures, and public debates on transparency in national institutions.
