Loading News Article...
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
/
/
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
Traders dealing in fake goods in Kenya face severe legal repercussions, including potential jail terms of up to 15 years and fines significantly exceeding the value of the counterfeit products, as authorities intensify efforts to curb illicit trade and protect intellectual property rights.
Kenya is cracking down on the proliferation of counterfeit goods with stringent penalties, including potential imprisonment for up to 15 years and fines that can be five times the value of the fake products. This move aims to deter illicit trade, which significantly harms the economy and endangers public health.
The Anti-Counterfeit Act No. 13 of 2008, which came into force in July 2009, prohibits trade in counterfeit goods and established the Anti-Counterfeit Authority (ACA) to enforce these measures. The ACA is mandated to combat counterfeiting, enlighten the public on related matters, and coordinate with national, regional, and international organizations.
Counterfeit goods pose a significant threat to Kenya's economy, with the country losing an estimated KSh 800 billion annually, equivalent to nearly 9% of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP), according to the Anti-Counterfeit Authority (ACA). This economic drain also leads to the loss of approximately 44,000 jobs each year. The illicit trade undermines legitimate businesses, stifles innovation, and deprives the government of crucial tax revenue.
Beyond economic losses, counterfeit products present serious public health risks. Fake medicines, for instance, are estimated to cause 500,000 deaths annually in Sub-Saharan Africa, leading to treatment failures and antibiotic resistance. Counterfeit automotive parts also jeopardize road safety.
The Anti-Counterfeit Act defines counterfeiting as the unauthorized manufacture, production, packaging, re-packaging, labeling, or making of goods that imitate protected intellectual property. Offences under the Act include possessing, controlling, manufacturing, selling, importing, or exporting counterfeit goods. The law also prohibits the possession of packaging or labels with counterfeit marks intended to deceive consumers.
For a first conviction, offenders face imprisonment for up to five years or a fine not less than three times the value of the prevailing retail price of the goods, or both. Subsequent convictions carry a stiffer penalty of up to 15 years imprisonment or a fine not less than five times the value of the goods, or both. The Act also makes it mandatory for intellectual property rights (IPR) relating to goods imported into Kenya to be recorded with the ACA.
The Anti-Counterfeit Authority works in collaboration with various agencies, including the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA), the Kenya Bureau of Standards (KEBS), and the police, to combat illicit trade through intelligence-led investigations and market surveillance. The government has also emphasized the importance of intellectual property protection for industrial growth and economic development, aligning with its Bottom-Up Economic Transformation Agenda (BETA).
Analysts suggest that these developments could influence public debate and policy execution, with stakeholders calling for clarity on timelines, costs, and safeguards. The ongoing efforts aim to create a more secure market for legitimate businesses and safer products for consumers.
The continued prevalence of counterfeit goods poses significant risks, including reduced government revenue, unfair competition for legitimate businesses, and potential harm to consumer health and safety. The economic impact can deter foreign direct investment and hinder industrial growth.
The full extent of the impact of the recently gazetted Anti-Counterfeit (Amendment) Regulations of 2021 and the Anti-Counterfeit (Recordation) Regulations of 2021 on the ground is still unfolding. The long-term effectiveness of these enhanced measures in significantly reducing counterfeit trade and fostering a more compliant market environment remains to be fully assessed.
Observers will be monitoring the effectiveness of the intensified enforcement efforts by the ACA and other agencies, particularly regarding the implementation of mandatory trademark recordation for imported goods. The impact on government revenue collection, job creation, and consumer safety will be key indicators of success.
