Loading News Article...
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
Safina Party leader Jimi Wanjigi has proposed scrapping Kenya’s existing 16% Value Added Tax (VAT) in favour of a 5% sales tax, a radical shift aimed at reducing the tax burden, simplifying compliance, and stimulating economic growth.
Nairobi, Kenya — September 27, 2025 (EAT).
Safina Party leader Jimi Wanjigi has proposed scrapping Kenya’s existing 16% Value Added Tax (VAT) in favour of a 5% sales tax, a radical shift aimed at reducing the tax burden, simplifying compliance, and stimulating economic growth.
In an announcement on X, Wanjigi described the VAT system as “inequitable and burdensome,” arguing that a lower, flat sales tax rate would boost consumption and ease pressure on both businesses and consumers.
He dubbed the proposed shift part of his broader “Debt Rebellion” agenda, which calls for bold fiscal reforms to reclaim Kenya’s economic sovereignty.
According to Wanjigi: “Every shilling spent on debt repayment robs Kenya’s future. We must simplify taxes to unleash growth.”
Replace VAT with 5% sales tax: All goods and services currently subject to VAT would instead be taxed via a flat rate at point of sale.
Broaden base, narrow exemptions: Wanjigi suggests minimizing exemptions and loopholes to preserve government revenues while ensuring fairness.
Simplify compliance: He envisions a leaner tax machinery that reduces administrative costs and corruption associated with complex VAT filings.
Fiscal recalibration: The proposal would need to be backed by growth-triggered revenue, spending cuts, or alternative sources to avoid budget shortfalls.
Current VAT system: VAT is Kenya’s key indirect tax, accounting for a large share of revenue but criticized for cascading effects and burden on low-income consumers.
Global precedent: Some countries have experimented with hybrid or low flat taxes (e.g., Hong Kong’s low corporate rates), though wholesale replacement of VAT is rare.
Revenue risk: A drop from 16% to 5% would drastically cut yields unless offset by volume, compliance gains, or new taxes.
Implementation hurdles: Legal amendments, stakeholder buy-in, transitional arrangements, and enforcement capacity are significant challenges.
Economists: Some caution that such a steep rate cut may create large fiscal gaps and debt pressure unless growth surges.
Business sector: Retailers and MSME operators may welcome simplified taxes, but supply chains may resist rate shifts.
Government / Treasury: The Finance Ministry has not publicly responded; analysts expect close scrutiny over feasibility and impact.
Political competitors: The proposal adds contrast to existing party platforms and may force debate on tax reform.
Whether Wanjigi has performed detailed revenue simulations to assess fiscal viability.
How exemptions—for essentials, agriculture, health, education—would be treated under the sales tax model.
How quickly and smoothly a legal and institutional transition could be achieved.
What complementary reforms (spending, debt, subsidies) would accompany such a tax overhaul.