Loading News Article...
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
/
/
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
Despite significant government expenditure on security, including millions spent on public forums, concerns are mounting over their effectiveness in addressing persistent insecurity across Kenya.
Kenyans are questioning the efficacy and cost of high-profile security meetings, often dubbed 'barazas,' as insecurity continues to plague various regions. These public forums, intended to reassure citizens and demonstrate the State's commitment to combating crime, are increasingly viewed as expensive spectacles that yield minimal tangible results.
A recent report by The Standard on Tuesday, October 7, 2025, highlighted that 'Jukwaa La Usalama' meetings, conducted across all 47 counties, have cost taxpayers a minimum of KSh 15 million per event. These funds are reportedly spent on logistical overheads such as convoys of vehicles, helicopter hire, lavish catering, and hotel accommodation, rather than direct investments in intelligence gathering, equipping local police posts, or protecting vulnerable communities.
Kenya's security landscape has been shaped by various challenges, including political violence, communal conflicts, and the persistent threat of terrorism from groups like Al-Shabaab. The government has historically responded with numerous initiatives and policy pronouncements aimed at enhancing security. However, a critical assessment suggests a disconnect between these announcements and their actual implementation. Past security operations have faced criticism for issues such as ethnic profiling and human rights violations, which have eroded public trust in security forces.
The Kenyan Constitution (2010) mandates the security and safety of all citizens. The National Crime Research Centre (NCRC) undertakes surveys to map crime prevalence and identify factors contributing to insecurity, informing crime prevention strategies. However, challenges in implementing national security policies persist due to gaps in the security architecture, socio-economic factors, and a need for institutional reform and political will.
Analysts suggest that the current approach to security meetings could influence public debate and policy execution. Stakeholders are urging for greater clarity on timelines, costs, and safeguards associated with these initiatives. While some studies, such as one on Machakos County, indicate that security meetings can enhance trust, cooperation, and communication between communities and policing agencies, leading to effective crime prevention, their overall impact is debated. Community participation in security agenda setting, particularly through information sharing and public meetings, has been identified as crucial.
Kenya's military spending has seen a significant increase, reaching KSh 166.08 billion in 2024, a 12.7% jump from KSh 147.37 billion in 2023, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). The national security budget for the 2023/2024 financial year was approximately $2.2 billion (KSh 323.4 billion at current exchange rates), allocated to the Kenya Defence Forces, National Police Service, and National Intelligence Service. For the 2024-2025 financial year, the security sector received an allocation of KSh 377.5 billion, an increase of KSh 39.3 billion from the previous year. The proposed budget for 2025/2026 further allocates KSh 464.9 billion to national security.
The substantial expenditure on security meetings, if not demonstrably effective, risks diverting crucial resources from more impactful security interventions. Public perception of security forces in Kenya has often been marred by allegations of corruption, extortion, and human rights abuses, which can undermine public confidence and trust – a vital component for sustainable solutions to violent extremism. A lack of transparency and accountability in resource allocation for security initiatives can further exacerbate these concerns.
The exact return on investment for the millions spent on security barazas remains an unanswered question. While the government emphasizes the importance of these forums, critics argue that they often lack actionable resolutions and consistent implementation. The balance between community engagement and effective, intelligence-led security operations is a continuous point of discussion.
The government continues to hold security meetings across the country. Future evaluations of these initiatives will likely focus on their measurable impact on crime rates and public safety. Calls for greater transparency in the allocation and utilisation of security funds are expected to intensify.
Observers will be keenly watching for concrete outcomes from ongoing security initiatives, including a reduction in crime rates and improved public trust in security agencies. The government's response to criticisms regarding the cost-effectiveness of security barazas and its strategy for more impactful community engagement will be critical. Additionally, the implementation of actionable resolutions from these meetings and their long-term effects on national security will be key indicators.
