Nairobi, Kenya – The choice between battery cage and deep litter systems for rearing layer hens is increasingly shaping the landscape of Kenya's burgeoning poultry industry. This decision carries significant implications for animal welfare, operational costs, and access to markets, with stakeholders urging for greater clarity in policy and enforcement.

Kenya's poultry sector is a vital component of the agricultural economy, contributing nearly 3% to the nation's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and supporting approximately 3 million small-scale farmers. With an estimated 50 million birds by 2024, the industry is experiencing rapid growth, driven by rising demand for eggs and meat in urban centers.

Historical and Political Context

Traditionally, poultry farming in Kenya largely relied on free-range and semi-intensive systems. However, the commercialization of poultry farming, spurred by the government's Agricultural Sector Development Strategy (ASDS) around 2010, led to a shift towards more intensive production methods. This push aimed to boost agricultural output and meet the increasing demand for poultry products. Despite this, a significant gap remains in the legislative framework, as there is no single, standalone statute specifically governing poultry farming in Kenya.

Laws, Policy, and Governance

Currently, the use of battery cage systems in Kenya is neither explicitly enacted nor unauthorized, operating in a legal grey area due to a scarcity of specific laws. While the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act of 1962 outlines general cruelty offenses and humane slaughter requirements, it lacks specific regulations for broiler chicken and egg-laying hen production systems. The Kenya Bureau of Standards (KEBS) introduced KS 2945:2022 poultry welfare standards, but their enforcement remains a challenge. Animal welfare organizations, such as the Africa Network for Animal Welfare (ANAW), have actively lobbied against battery cages, citing concerns over limited movement, stress, and inability for birds to express natural behaviors.

Stakeholders and Testimonies

Farmers like Mary Nduta in Dagoretti South, Nairobi County, have embraced the deep litter system for her 2,500 chickens, citing benefits in bird health and reduced disease risk through minimal human contact. Conversely, some commercial farmers, like Ron Bridge, have reported increased egg collection and better disease control after transitioning to battery cage systems, managing 10,000 laying hens compared to 3,000 on the ground. Dr. Dennis Bahati, an animal welfare program manager with ANAW, emphasizes that battery cages restrict natural behaviors, leading to physical and psychological health issues for the birds.

Evidence and Data

The deep litter system, where chickens are reared on concrete floors covered with absorbent materials like wood shavings, is widely used across Kenya. It is generally considered cheaper to construct and allows birds more freedom of movement, which can lead to better social welfare and natural temperature regulation. Additionally, deep litter systems produce valuable manure, which can be sold or used in mixed farming.

Battery cage systems, while requiring higher initial capital investment, offer advantages such as efficient space utilization, easier hygiene maintenance, reduced labor for egg collection, and lower incidence of parasitic diseases. For instance, setting up a battery cage system for 20,000 layers can cost between $15,000 and $30,000 (approximately KSh 2,200,000 to KSh 4,400,000 at current exchange rates). A smaller system for 128 layers can cost around KSh 39,999. However, these cages provide minimal space, often less than an A4 sheet of paper per bird, leading to stress, feather loss, and weakened bones.

Risks and Implications

The lack of clear legislative frameworks creates uncertainty for farmers and can lead to inconsistent animal welfare practices. While battery cages can boost production efficiency, concerns about animal welfare are growing, with some major food companies globally phasing out eggs from caged systems. This could potentially impact Kenyan producers' access to international markets in the future. Furthermore, intensive confinement in battery cages may increase the risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), posing a public health threat.

Unknowns and Controversies

The debate continues regarding the long-term economic viability and ethical implications of both systems. While deep litter systems are praised for animal welfare, they can be more labor-intensive and susceptible to faster disease spread if not managed properly. Conversely, the high initial cost of battery cages and the ethical concerns surrounding them remain points of contention. Consumer preference also plays a role, with some high-end markets reportedly preferring eggs from deep litter or cage-free systems.

Timeline and Next Steps

The Kenyan poultry industry is projected to reach 148,000 metric tons by 2028, growing at 3% annually from an estimated 123,000 metric tons in 2023. This growth necessitates a clearer policy direction on poultry housing systems. Ongoing discussions among stakeholders, including government bodies, farmers' associations, and animal welfare groups, are crucial to developing comprehensive and enforceable regulations that balance productivity with animal well-being.

What to Watch

Watch for potential legislative reforms aimed at addressing animal welfare in poultry farming, possibly influenced by international standards and consumer demand for ethically produced eggs and meat. The enforcement of KEBS poultry welfare standards will also be a key area to monitor, as will the adoption of alternative, cage-free housing systems that offer improved welfare while maintaining economic viability.

Related Stories

• Urban Poultry Farming Boom Sparks Welfare Concerns
• Poultry Stakeholders in Kenya Adapt Welfare Practices to Improve Productivity
• The Cost of Layers Battery Cages in Kenya