Loading News Article...
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
The legal battle highlights the intensifying global crackdown on oligarch wealth in offshore havens, a development with significant implications for Kenya's efforts to trace and repatriate illicitly acquired assets.

Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich is alleging a “conspiracy” against the government of Jersey, a British Crown Dependency, escalating a high-stakes legal battle over more than $7 billion in assets frozen since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The case, unfolding in one of the world's major offshore financial centres, casts a spotlight on the global effort to sanction oligarchs and scrutinise the origins of vast fortunes, a precedent closely watched by nations like Kenya grappling with illicit financial flows.
The latest development, reported on Sunday, 16 November 2025, saw Mr. Abramovich drop his request for a gagging order on the court proceedings. This move allows him to pursue the conspiracy claim and will make public previously secret details of the two-year fight, including private communications from Jersey government officials which a court has ordered to be released. A spokesperson for Abramovich stated that no charges have been filed in the three and a half years since the investigation began and alleged a lack of progress in the case.
The core of the dispute dates back to April 2022, when the Royal Court of Jersey imposed a formal freezing order on the assets, stating they were “suspected to be connected to Mr Abramovich”. Jersey's Attorney General also confirmed at the time that Abramovich was a suspect in a criminal investigation into alleged corruption and money laundering. According to Swiss court documents released in September 2025, which approved Jersey's request for banking records, investigators are examining the origins of Abramovich's wealth, particularly from the 1990s in post-Soviet Russia. Mr. Abramovich has consistently denied any wrongdoing.
While the legal drama plays out thousands of kilometres away, its implications resonate in Kenya and across East Africa. The aggressive stance taken by jurisdictions like Jersey, traditionally viewed as secretive financial havens, signals a significant shift in the global fight against illicitly acquired wealth. This development is particularly relevant for Kenya, which has intensified its efforts to recover stolen assets stashed abroad.
Kenya has established a specific legal and diplomatic framework for this purpose. A key pillar is the Framework for the Return of Assets from Corruption and Crime in Kenya (FRACCK), a multilateral agreement signed by Kenya, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, and, crucially, Jersey. This framework came into effect in December 2018 and has already facilitated the return of funds. For instance, in March 2022, Kenya and Jersey signed an Asset Recovery Agreement for the return of approximately KSh 450 million (£3 million) confiscated from a company linked to former officials. These funds were allocated to support Kenya's response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Abramovich case could set a powerful precedent. The level of scrutiny applied to his fortune and the international cooperation between Switzerland and Jersey demonstrate a strengthened resolve to pierce the veil of offshore secrecy. For Kenyan authorities, such as the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) and the Assets Recovery Agency (ARA), this global momentum could provide greater leverage in pursuing complex cross-border recovery cases.
The legal battle also serves as a critical test for Jersey itself. The island's government has stated its commitment to combating financial crime and has actively implemented UK and international sanctions against Russia. However, Abramovich's lawyers now accuse the government of misconduct, including the alleged deletion of case-related data. A Jersey court has criticised the government's failure to provide requested data to Abramovich's legal team as “extreme” and “unreasonable”.
As the details of this case become public, it will offer a rare glimpse into the inner workings of international asset freezes and the challenges of holding both oligarchs and the jurisdictions that house their wealth to account. The outcome will be monitored by governments worldwide, including in Nairobi, as it could reshape the strategies used to recover the proceeds of corruption for the benefit of citizens.