We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
Breaking heavily with decades of established diplomatic precedent, the United States has commenced offering direct consular services within Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, drawing fierce condemnation from Palestinian authorities.

In a deeply controversial policy pivot, the United States has effectively extended its diplomatic footprint into the occupied West Bank, initiating on-site passport and consular services within Israeli settlements that are universally deemed illegal under international law.
This provocative move, executed by the US Embassy in Jerusalem, threatens to irreversibly fracture the fragile prospects for a two-state solution. For global observers, including East African nations that champion international law and territorial sovereignty, the decision represents a stark, practical recognition of Israel’s creeping annexation of Palestinian lands.
The initiative, ostensibly framed as a celebration marking the 250th anniversary of US independence, began with a 'one day only' routine passport service operation in the settlement of Efrat, located south of Jerusalem. The embassy has explicitly announced plans to expand these services to Beitar Illit, alongside operations in the Palestinian city of Ramallah.
Efrat, home to roughly 12,000 Israelis—including a significant population of dual American-Israeli nationals—sits on land captured by Israel during the 1967 Middle East war. Decades of US foreign policy traditionally avoided direct consular engagement inside these settlements to avoid legitimizing the occupation. This sudden reversal aligns heavily with the right-wing ambitions of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s ruling coalition.
The reaction from Palestinian leadership has been swift and unequivocally furious. The Palestinian Authority's Colonization and Wall Resistance Commission condemned the initiative as a 'blatant favoring of the occupation authorities.'
Mu'ayyad Shaa'ban, the head of the commission, articulated the gravity of the situation, stating that the step deeply entrenches a settlement reality that systematically dismantles the possibility of establishing an independent and sovereign Palestinian state. The militant group Hamas echoed these sentiments, labeling the US move a 'dangerous precedent.'
The geopolitical ramifications of this shift extend far beyond the Levant. By normalizing bureaucratic integration with illegal settlements, Washington is actively eroding the international rules-based order. For nations in the Global South that rely on the strict adherence to international law to protect their own sovereignties, this selective application of legality is deeply alarming.
The maneuver essentially rewards aggressive territorial expansionism, emboldening violent settler movements that have repeatedly targeted Palestinian villages in areas like Masafer Yatta with arson and intimidation.
'This isn’t neutral diplomacy; it is complicity dressed up in the mundane bureaucracy of passport renewals,' noted an international security analyst, summarizing the devastating critique of Washington's new posture.
Keep the conversation in one place—threads here stay linked to the story and in the forums.
Sign in to start a discussion
Start a conversation about this story and keep it linked here.
Other hot threads
E-sports and Gaming Community in Kenya
Active 9 months ago
The Role of Technology in Modern Agriculture (AgriTech)
Active 9 months ago
Popular Recreational Activities Across Counties
Active 9 months ago
Investing in Youth Sports Development Programs
Active 9 months ago