We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
Sussan Ley plans a Liberal-only frontbench to survive a leadership crisis after the Nationals quit the Coalition, gambling her political future on a split opposition.

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley is preparing to unveil a high-stakes, Liberal-only frontbench within days, a defiant move that formalizes the fracturing of the Coalition but signals her determination to stare down internal dissent. As the Nationals walk away, Ley is banking on a new, unified team to save her leadership from a looming right-wing insurgency.
The political marriage between the Liberals and the Nationals, a cornerstone of conservative power in Australia for decades, has effectively collapsed for the second time in eight months. The trigger—a revolt over Labor’s hate speech laws—has morphed into an existential crisis for Ley. With Nationals Leader David Littleproud declaring the alliance "untenable" and pulling his MPs from the shadow cabinet, Ley faces a defining moment: govern alone in opposition or face a leadership spill that could install conservatives Andrew Hastie or Angus Taylor.
For Ley, the decision to proceed with a Liberal-only frontbench is not just administrative; it is a tactical maneuver to assert authority. By filling the vacancies left by the Nationals with loyalists, she aims to present a picture of stability and decisiveness before Parliament returns next week. "Our credibility as a party would be in tatters if we allowed the Nationals to dictate our leadership," a senior Liberal MP told The Guardian on condition of anonymity. "We cannot be held hostage by a junior partner that has shown complete disregard for cabinet solidarity."
The split was precipitated when Ley sacked three Nationals senators—Bridget McKenzie, Ross Cadell, and Susan McDonald—for crossing the floor to vote against the Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026. The Nationals’ subsequent mass resignation from the frontbench was intended to cripple Ley, but it may have inadvertently emboldened her supporters, who argue that the Liberals must rediscover their own identity independent of the "agrarian socialist" influence of the Nationals.
David Littleproud’s rhetoric has been scorching. accusing Ley of failing to understand the "nuance" of the Nationals' position on free speech. However, insiders suggest Littleproud is playing his own survival game, facing pressure from his party’s base to differentiate the Nationals from a Liberal Party they view as increasingly "woke." The rupture leaves the opposition in a precarious state: two separate parties sitting on the same side of the chamber but operating with different agendas, different policies, and arguably, different values.
As the clock ticks down to the parliamentary resumption, the corridors of Canberra are thick with intrigue. If Ley pulls this off, she could emerge as the "Iron Lady" who disciplined the Nationals. If she fails, she will be remembered as the leader who presided over the permanent divorce of the Australian right.
Keep the conversation in one place—threads here stay linked to the story and in the forums.
Sign in to start a discussion
Start a conversation about this story and keep it linked here.
Other hot threads
E-sports and Gaming Community in Kenya
Active 9 months ago
The Role of Technology in Modern Agriculture (AgriTech)
Active 9 months ago
Popular Recreational Activities Across Counties
Active 9 months ago
Investing in Youth Sports Development Programs
Active 9 months ago