We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
A task force led by former DCJ Nancy Baraza recommends mandatory chemical castration for sexual offenders and the criminalization of out-of-court settlements, sparking a fierce debate on justice versus human rights.

In a draconian shift that signals the government’s desperation to curb the rising tide of sexual violence, a state-backed task force has recommended mandatory chemical castration for convicted paedophiles and sexual offenders. The proposal, which has sent shockwaves through the legal and human rights fraternities, represents the most aggressive stance yet by the Kenyan administration in its war against gender-based violence (GBV).
The 42-member Technical Working Group, chaired by the formidable former Deputy Chief Justice Dr. Nancy Baraza, was convened in January 2025 following a national outcry over femicide. Their report, now awaiting President William Ruto’s seal of approval, argues that the current penal code is insufficient to deter the "predatory instincts" of serial offenders. The recommendation is stark: amend the Sexual Offences Act of 2006 to administer libido-suppressing drugs to those who violate the sanctity of the body.
Chemical castration involves the administration of anti-androgen drugs, such as medroxyprogesterone acetate, which reduce testosterone levels to prepubescent lows, effectively eliminating sexual drive. While used in countries like Poland, South Korea, and parts of the United States, its introduction in Kenya would mark a radical departure from traditional restorative justice models.
Proponents argue that for paedophiles, the urge to offend is pathological and biological, requiring a biological intervention. "We are dealing with monsters who cannot be rehabilitated by prison walls alone," a source within the task force revealed. "You must disarm the weapon." However, medical ethicists warn of the long-term health consequences, including bone density loss and cardiovascular risks, raising the question: can the state legally alter a citizen’s biology?
The proposal is set to face a fierce battle in the courts. Human rights organizations, including Amnesty International Kenya, are expected to challenge the constitutionality of the measure, arguing it constitutes "cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment" under Article 29. Yet, the public mood is unforgiving. With the names of femicide victims still fresh in the national memory, the political capital for "soft" justice has evaporated.
As the debate moves to Parliament, Kenya finds itself at a moral crossroads. The government is signaling that it is willing to use the ultimate biological weapon to protect its women and children, even if it means stepping into the ethical grey zone of state-sanctioned medical intervention.
Keep the conversation in one place—threads here stay linked to the story and in the forums.
Sign in to start a discussion
Start a conversation about this story and keep it linked here.
Other hot threads
E-sports and Gaming Community in Kenya
Active 9 months ago
The Role of Technology in Modern Agriculture (AgriTech)
Active 9 months ago
Popular Recreational Activities Across Counties
Active 9 months ago
Investing in Youth Sports Development Programs
Active 9 months ago