We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
As the new 2.75% SHIF deduction takes effect, Afrobarometer data reveals that 89% of Kenyans fear they cannot afford care, signaling a rocky start for the state’s universal coverage ambitions.

For millions of Kenyans, the reality of the new Social Health Insurance Fund (SHIF) arrived not with a bang, but with a sharp deduction on their January pay slips. The transition from the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) has officially moved from policy papers to bank balances, and the initial public reaction is a volatile mix of confusion, skepticism, and anxiety.
The rollout, which mandates a 2.75% contribution from gross income, represents the most significant shake-up of Kenya’s health financing in decades. Yet, as the government pushes for full implementation, startling new data from Afrobarometer reveals a crisis of confidence: only 39% of Kenyans currently possess any form of medical aid, and a staggering 89% report living in fear that they will be unable to afford necessary care. This disconnect between the state’s ambitious revenue collection and the citizenry’s fragile financial health is shaping up to be the defining political battle of 2026.
The government argues that the shift to SHIF is essential for achieving Universal Health Coverage (UHC), replacing the flat-rate inequities of the old NHIF with a progressive percentage-based model. In theory, this means higher earners subsidize the care of the vulnerable. In practice, however, the administrative transition has been fraught with friction. Reports from counties indicate that while deductions are active, access to services remains inconsistent, with some facilities turning away patients due to system outages or delayed capitation payments.
Critics point out that the Afrobarometer findings underscore a deep-seated vulnerability. When nearly nine out of ten citizens fear medical bankruptcy, a mandatory deduction feels less like insurance and more like a tax. The promise of "care for all" is colliding with the reality of "payment by all," regardless of service quality. The breakdown of trust is palpable in hospital waiting rooms where patients are still being asked to pay cash despite being registered scheme members.
Perhaps the most Herculean task facing the Social Health Authority is capturing the informal sector. While salaried workers are easily levied through check-off systems, the millions of Kenyans in the "jua kali" sector remain largely outside the net. The financing model relies heavily on a broad base of contributors, but without a seamless mechanism to collect from informal earners, the burden risks falling disproportionately on the formal workforce.
As the year progresses, the success of SHIF will not be measured by the billions collected, but by the number of Kenyans who can walk into a hospital without the paralyzing fear of financial ruin. For now, the jury is out, and the public is watching every shilling.
Keep the conversation in one place—threads here stay linked to the story and in the forums.
Sign in to start a discussion
Start a conversation about this story and keep it linked here.
Other hot threads
E-sports and Gaming Community in Kenya
Active 9 months ago
The Role of Technology in Modern Agriculture (AgriTech)
Active 9 months ago
Popular Recreational Activities Across Counties
Active 9 months ago
Investing in Youth Sports Development Programs
Active 9 months ago