Loading News Article...
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth now says he 'didn't stick around' for a follow-up strike on a boat off Venezuela, putting a decorated admiral at the center of a growing storm over the rules of war.

U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth acknowledged he was not present for a controversial second missile strike on a boat off the coast of Venezuela on September 2, a mission that reportedly killed two survivors clinging to the wreckage. His admission during a televised cabinet meeting adds a new layer to a crisis that has triggered bipartisan alarm in Washington over potential breaches of military law.
The incident raises urgent questions about the chain of command and the legality of an expanding American campaign against alleged "narco-terrorists." The core of the controversy is whether the U.S. military executed defenseless individuals, a potential war crime, and who bears ultimate responsibility.
Hegseth told reporters he watched the first strike "live" but left for another meeting before a second missile was fired. "A couple of hours later, I learned that that commander had made the [decision], which he had the complete authority to do," Hegseth stated, defending decorated Navy Admiral Frank Bradley as having made the "right call."
This account appears to shift responsibility to Adm. Bradley, who was promoted to head the U.S. Special Operations Command a month after the incident. It also contrasts with Hegseth's earlier boast that he "watched it live," which critics now point to as evidence of a changing narrative.
The controversy did not deter President Donald Trump, who used the cabinet meeting to announce a significant escalation. He warned that any country believed to be producing or trafficking drugs to the U.S. is "subject to attack" and that strikes would soon expand to land targets. "We're going to start doing those strikes on land, too," Trump declared. "We know where they live... and we're going to start that very soon."
This new doctrine signals a potentially dramatic expansion of U.S. military operations in Latin America, moving beyond maritime interdictions to attacks within sovereign nations. Since September, at least 21 strikes have killed more than 80 people.
The response from opposition Democrats has been furious. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer labeled Hegseth a "spineless" and "national embarrassment," demanding the public release of unedited tapes of the September 2 strikes. "If Secretary Hegseth has nothing to hide, he should not fear being truthful," Schumer noted in a floor speech.
Key developments in the situation include:
The demand for the unedited recordings will likely intensify as lawmakers seek to determine whether Hegseth's new account is a clarification or a cover-up. The coming days will prove critical in determining whether this incident remains a political firestorm or escalates into a full-blown legal and diplomatic crisis.
Keep the conversation in one place—threads here stay linked to the story and in the forums.
Other hot threads
E-sports and Gaming Community in Kenya
Active 6 months ago
Popular Recreational Activities Across Counties
Active 6 months ago
The Role of Technology in Modern Agriculture (AgriTech)
Active 6 months ago
Investing in Youth Sports Development Programs
Active 6 months ago