We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
Rio Tinto and Glencore abandon their $260bn merger talks after clashing over valuation and leadership, causing Glencore shares to plummet and ending a bid to create the world’s largest miner.

The mining world has been rocked by the sudden collapse of what would have been the deal of the century. After weeks of high-stakes poker, Rio Tinto and Glencore have walked away from a $260 billion merger table, leaving the dream of creating the planet’s undisputed commodities king in tatters.
The "Put Up or Shut Up" deadline has passed in London, and with it, the prospect of a mining behemoth that would have reshaped the global economy. Rio Tinto, the predator in these negotiations, formally announced it was withdrawing its interest, citing an inability to reach terms that would deliver sufficient value to its shareholders. The decision brings a screeching halt to a revived courtship that had sent shockwaves through trading floors from Sydney to Johannesburg.
At the heart of the breakdown lies a fundamental disagreement over value. Glencore’s board, entrenched in their headquarters, reportedly viewed Rio’s overtures as a significant undervaluation of their company—specifically their copper dominance. "They wanted the keys to the kingdom without paying the premium," a source close to the Glencore camp remarked. "Our copper pipeline is the future of electrification, and we aren’t selling it for scrap prices."
This was never just about size; it was about the future of energy. Copper is the new oil, the critical metal for the green energy transition, and Glencore sits on some of the world's most enviable reserves. Rio Tinto’s aggressive pursuit was widely interpreted by analysts as a strategic lunge to corner this market. By acquiring Glencore, Rio would have instantly transformed from an iron ore giant into a diversified battery-metals superpower.
However, the deal's mechanics proved too thorny. Insiders suggest that the proposed structure, which would have seen Rio Tinto retain both the Chair and CEO positions, was viewed by Glencore’s leadership as a takeover dressed up as a merger. The refusal to treat Glencore as a true equal in the boardroom likely poisoned the chalice long before the valuation numbers were finalized.
This is not the first time these two giants have danced only to step on each other's toes. This marks the third collapse in talks between the entities, reinforcing the view that their corporate cultures are oil and water. Rio, the conservative Anglo-Australian establishment firm, and Glencore, the sharp-elbowed trader-miner founded by Marc Rich, have always been uneasy bedfellows in theory.
The collapse leaves a vacuum in the sector. With the "merger of equals" off the table, the question now is where Rio Tinto turns its firepower next. With a war chest ready and a desperate need to diversify away from iron ore, the hunter is still on the prowl. For Glencore, the message is clear: the market expects them to unlock value, or the sharks will circle again.
Keep the conversation in one place—threads here stay linked to the story and in the forums.
Other hot threads
E-sports and Gaming Community in Kenya
Active 8 months ago
The Role of Technology in Modern Agriculture (AgriTech)
Active 8 months ago
Popular Recreational Activities Across Counties
Active 8 months ago
Investing in Youth Sports Development Programs
Active 8 months ago