We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
A new lawsuit threatens to derail the cooperation pact between President Ruto and Governor Sakaja, with activists labeling it an unconstitutional power grab.

The ink has barely dried on the cooperation agreement between President William Ruto and Governor Johnson Sakaja, yet a high-stakes court battle already threatens to tear it apart.
A coalition of civil society groups and legal activists has filed an urgent petition at the Milimani Law Courts, seeking to declare the deal unconstitutional. They argue that the agreement, which transfers key county functions back to the national government, is an assault on devolution and a betrayal of the Nairobi electorate who voted for autonomy, not a proxy administration.
The petitioners claim the deal is a "Trojan Horse" designed to resurrect the defunct Nairobi Metropolitan Services (NMS). The memory of the NMS era, characterized by militarized management and opaque procurement, still looms large over the city. Under the new agreement, the national government would take over critical roles such as planning, transport, and health, ostensibly to improve service delivery. However, critics see it as a power grab by the Executive.
"This is a constitutional coup," said the lead counsel for the petitioners. "The Governor was elected to manage the city. He cannot abdicate his responsibilities to State House simply because the job is difficult. If he cannot govern, he should resign, but he cannot subcontract his mandate." The court filing cites Article 187 of the Constitution, arguing that the transfer of functions lacks the necessary public participation and approval from the County Assembly.
Governor Sakaja finds himself isolated. While he frames the deal as a "partnership for progress," his allies in the assembly are revolting, and his detractors are emboldened. The Governor has argued that the city’s unique status as the capital requires close collaboration with the President, but the optics of "surrendering" the city are damaging his political standing.
The court has certified the matter as urgent, with a hearing scheduled for early next week. If the judge issues conservatory orders halting the implementation, it will be a major embarrassment for both the President and the Governor. Conversely, if the deal proceeds, it sets a precedent that could see other struggling counties "taken over" by the national government, effectively rolling back the gains of devolution. For now, the fate of Nairobi’s governance lies not in City Hall, but in the corridors of justice.
Keep the conversation in one place—threads here stay linked to the story and in the forums.
Sign in to start a discussion
Start a conversation about this story and keep it linked here.
Other hot threads
E-sports and Gaming Community in Kenya
Active 9 months ago
The Role of Technology in Modern Agriculture (AgriTech)
Active 9 months ago
Popular Recreational Activities Across Counties
Active 9 months ago
Investing in Youth Sports Development Programs
Active 9 months ago