Loading News Article...
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
/
/
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
The High Court in Nairobi has dismissed a petition by Nairobi Members of Parliament seeking to halt the ongoing Kenya Defence Forces (KDF) recruitment, prioritising national security and allowing the exercise to proceed as scheduled until Friday, October 25, 2025.
The High Court in Nairobi, on Wednesday, October 23, 2025, declined to issue an injunction stopping the Kenya Defence Forces (KDF) recruitment drive for the 2025 intake. Justice Bahati Mwamuye ruled that public interest in maintaining national security and defence capabilities outweighed the concerns raised by Nairobi legislators regarding alleged discrimination in the allocation of recruitment centres.
The petition, spearheaded by Embakasi West MP Mark Mwenje, Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna, and Woman Representative Esther Passaris, argued that Nairobi County had been unfairly treated by being allocated only three recruitment centres for its 17 sub-counties. They contended that other counties had recruitment centres designated at each sub-county level, leading to an inequitable and discriminatory process for Nairobi residents.
The KDF recruitment process has historically faced scrutiny over transparency and fairness. Concerns about corruption and bribery have been raised in past exercises, prompting calls for reforms. The KDF has consistently warned the public against fraudsters and emphasised that recruitment is free and based on merit.
In a significant move towards greater transparency, the KDF has introduced a digital Recruitment Management System for the 2025 intake. This system aims to capture biometrics and personal data, and instantly generate calling letters, thereby curbing the use of fake physical letters by unscrupulous individuals.
The legislators' petition was grounded in Article 27 of the Kenyan Constitution, which guarantees equality and freedom from discrimination. They argued that the consolidated recruitment centres in Nairobi violated these constitutional principles.
Justice Mwamuye, however, emphasised that the petitioners had not demonstrated how a suspension of the recruitment would avoid jeopardising public interest or national security. He stated that halting the entire national recruitment based on alleged non-compliance in one county would significantly compromise public interest.
The KDF's general recruitment requirements stipulate that applicants must be Kenyan citizens with a valid national ID, possess a KRA PIN certificate, and have no criminal record. Age limits vary by position, with General Service Officer (GSO) Cadets and General Duty Recruits typically aged between 18 and 26 years. Physical standards include minimum height and weight requirements, and female candidates must not be pregnant during recruitment or training.
The petitioners, including MPs Mark Mwenje, Edwin Sifuna, and Esther Passaris, expressed their dissatisfaction with the allocation of recruitment centres, arguing it would exclude many eligible youths due to logistical constraints and congestion.
Conversely, the Attorney-General and the Ministry of Defence urged the court to dismiss the petition, asserting it lacked merit and that the recruitment was vital for bolstering the country's security framework.
Vice Chief of the Defence Forces Lieutenant General John Omenda previously cautioned aspiring recruits against scams, reiterating that the recruitment process is official and any exercise outside the set timeline is illegal.
The court's decision allows the KDF recruitment to proceed without interruption, ensuring the continuous replenishment of the country's defence forces. However, the concerns raised by the Nairobi MPs regarding equitable access to recruitment centres remain arguable issues that will be addressed in the full hearing of the case.
The high turnout of youth compared to limited available slots remains a significant challenge during recruitment drives, as noted by Brigadier General Samuel Kimani, the Nationwide KDF 2025 Chief Recruiting Officer.
While the court acknowledged the arguable nature of the MPs' concerns regarding discrimination, the full merits of the case are yet to be heard. The long-term implications of the centralised recruitment centres in Nairobi on the participation of eligible youth from various sub-counties are still to be fully assessed.
Observers will be keen to follow the full hearing of the petition by Nairobi MPs, as the outcome could influence future KDF recruitment policies and the allocation of recruitment centres across the country. The effectiveness of the new digital recruitment system in enhancing transparency and curbing corruption will also be closely monitored.
