We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
Morgan McSweeney resigns as Keir Starmer’s chief of staff, accepting blame for the controversial appointment of Peter Mandelson as US Ambassador.

The mastermind behind Labour’s landslide victory has fallen on his sword. Morgan McSweeney has resigned as Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s chief of staff, taking full responsibility for the disastrous appointment of Peter Mandelson as US Ambassador.
In a dramatic Sunday shake-up at Downing Street, the man credited with engineering Labour’s return to power has exited the stage. Morgan McSweeney, often described as the "brain" of the Starmer operation, released a resignation letter that was as blunt as it was final. He admitted that advising the Prime Minister to appoint Peter Mandelson was a "wrong" decision that has damaged the party and eroded public trust.
This resignation is a seismic event in British politics. It signals that the fallout from the Mandelson appointment—which has been dogged by controversies surrounding his past associations with Jeffrey Epstein—is far more toxic than Number 10 initially calculated. By stepping down, McSweeney is attempting to act as a firebreak, hoping to shield the Prime Minister from the encroaching flames of the scandal.
McSweeney’s resignation statement was a masterclass in taking the hit. "When asked, I advised the prime minister to make that appointment and I take full responsibility for that advice," he wrote. "In public life, responsibility must be owned when it matters most, not just when it is most convenient."
The "Mandelson Fiasco," as it is now being called, has dominated the headlines for days. The decision to send the former spin doctor to Washington was meant to leverage his connections, but it backfired spectacularly when scrutiny turned to his financial dealings and past friendships. McSweeney’s departure raises serious questions about the vetting processes at the heart of government.
While McSweeney has taken the fall, the ultimate question remains: Why did Keir Starmer sign off on the appointment? The Prime Minister has accepted the resignation with "gratitude for his service," but the political damage is done. The narrative has shifted from a government delivering change to an administration mired in the sleaze and cronyism of the past.
For McSweeney, who spent years plotting Labour’s path out of the wilderness, this is a bitter end. He leaves Downing Street not in triumph, but as a casualty of one of the most controversial personnel decisions in recent memory. "The only honourable course is to step aside," he concluded—a rare moment of accountability in a political culture that often lacks it.
Keep the conversation in one place—threads here stay linked to the story and in the forums.
Sign in to start a discussion
Start a conversation about this story and keep it linked here.
Other hot threads
E-sports and Gaming Community in Kenya
Active 9 months ago
The Role of Technology in Modern Agriculture (AgriTech)
Active 9 months ago
Popular Recreational Activities Across Counties
Active 9 months ago
Investing in Youth Sports Development Programs
Active 9 months ago