Loading News Article...
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
A High Court ruling allows President Ruto to invite advisers such as David\u00a0Ndii and Monica\u00a0Juma to Cabinet meetings for expert input, provided they do not attend permanently or vote on decisions.
Nairobi, August 15, 2025 — The High Court has ruled that President William Ruto may invite external advisers—including economist David Ndii, National Security Advisor Monica Juma, Women’s Rights Advisor Harriette Chiggai, and UDA Secretary-General Cleophas Malala—to attend Cabinet meetings. The court dismissed a petition challenging their involvement as unconstitutional.
No constitutional violation: Justice Lawrence Mugambi found the Constitution does not prohibit the President from consulting experts during policy discussions.
Adviser roles clarified: Non-Cabinet advisers are allowed to attend meetings but cannot vote, participate permanently, or replace official Cabinet members.
Petitioner’s concern dismissed: Activist Walter Dzuya had argued that such advisers are not subject to the same accountability mechanisms as Cabinet members. The court disagreed, noting the advisers hold no executive function.
Flexible expertise: The ruling enables the President to access targeted technical inputs without undermining the formal Cabinet structures.
Maintained separation of power: Decision-making authority remains firmly with Cabinet members.
Clarity on legal framework: This sets a precedent that the President may invite external opinions within a structured, non-voting capacity.
Key Element |
Details |
---|---|
Advisers Permitted |
David Ndii, Monica Juma, Harriette Chiggai, Cleophas Malala |
Ruling Basis |
Constitution doesn’t bar the President from consulting advisers |
Advisers Cannot |
Vote, permanently sit, or make decisions in Cabinet |
Petitioner’s Argument |
Lack of accountability for non-Cabinet advisers |
Court’s Verdict |
No violation; advisory participation is constitutionally permissible |
Related to "Court Allows President Advisers to Attend Cabinet ..."