We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
The British broadcaster is moving to dismiss the staggering defamation claim, arguing a Florida court has no jurisdiction over a documentary it insists was never aired in the United States.

The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) is preparing for a high-stakes legal battle with former US President Donald Trump, vowing to fight a $10 billion (approx. KES 1.3 trillion) defamation lawsuit filed against it in a Florida court.
The lawsuit confronts fundamental questions of press freedom, jurisdictional reach, and the increasing use of litigation against media organisations—issues that resonate deeply within Kenya's own vibrant and often scrutinised press corps. The outcome could set a precedent for how global news outlets report on powerful international figures.
Mr. Trump's 33-page complaint alleges the BBC produced a "false, defamatory, deceptive, disparaging, inflammatory, and malicious depiction" of him. The claim centres on the Panorama documentary, "Trump: A Second Chance?", which was broadcast in the UK a week before the 2024 US presidential election.
The lawsuit specifically accuses the BBC of deceptively splicing together two separate parts of a speech Mr. Trump gave on January 6, 2021, before the attack on the US Capitol. The edit, his lawyers argued, was a "brazen attempt to interfere in and influence" the election by misrepresenting his words to sound like a direct call for violence.
The BBC's core defense strategy is expected to be jurisdictional. The corporation will argue that:
While the BBC has previously apologised for what its chairman called an "error of judgment" in the edit, it has consistently maintained there is no basis for a defamation claim. The decision to fight the lawsuit, rather than settle, has been met with relief by press freedom advocates who warned that a settlement would undermine the broadcaster's editorial independence.
This legal tactic, sometimes called a "Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation" (SLAPP), is increasingly used to intimidate and silence journalists through costly and time-consuming litigation. For Kenyan journalists, who often face immense pressure while covering powerful figures, this international case serves as a critical reminder of the legal risks inherent in public interest reporting.
Mr. Trump's complaint counters that the program could have been viewed in Florida via the BritBox streaming service or by using a Virtual Private Network (VPN). The BBC has not directly responded to these specific claims.
The controversy has already had significant repercussions within the BBC, leading to the resignations of Director-General Tim Davie and the head of BBC News, Deborah Turness. International media lawyers have noted that the case is likely to be dismissed but that the political, rather than financial, aim may be Mr. Trump's primary motivation.
The case continues to develop, with journalists and legal analysts in Nairobi and worldwide watching closely. The initial rulings on jurisdiction will be pivotal, not just for the BBC, but for the future of global investigative journalism.
Keep the conversation in one place—threads here stay linked to the story and in the forums.
Other hot threads
E-sports and Gaming Community in Kenya
Active 7 months ago
Popular Recreational Activities Across Counties
Active 7 months ago
The Role of Technology in Modern Agriculture (AgriTech)
Active 7 months ago
Investing in Youth Sports Development Programs
Active 7 months ago