Loading News Article...
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
We're loading the full news article for you. This includes the article content, images, author information, and related articles.
Sunday's high-stakes midterm election will test the viability of radical libertarian reforms in a major emerging economy, offering potential lessons for nations like Kenya grappling with IMF-backed austerity and high inflation.

Argentinians will head to the polls on Sunday, October 26, 2025, for a critical midterm election that serves as a public referendum on President Javier Milei's aggressive "shock therapy" economic policies. The vote, in which half of the 257 seats in the lower house and 24 of the 72 seats in the Senate are contested, represents a pivotal moment for the self-described anarcho-capitalist's administration. A strong showing for his La Libertad Avanza (LLA) party could embolden his austerity agenda, while a significant loss could weaken his presidency and lead to political gridlock.
Since taking office in December 2023, President Milei has implemented drastic measures to combat Argentina's chronic economic instability. His administration has focused on slashing public spending, leading to the country's first fiscal surplus in over a decade. These policies have had a dramatic effect on inflation, which has fallen from a peak of over 288% annually to rates hovering around 32% by September 2025, according to the National Institute of Statistics and Censuses (INDEC). However, these austerity measures have inflicted significant social pain, with poverty rates remaining a major concern. The economy, which contracted in 2024, is projected by the IMF to grow in 2025, but the recovery remains fragile.
Milei's reform agenda has faced considerable political opposition. His party's recent defeat in the key provincial election in Buenos Aires on September 7, 2025, where the opposition Justicialist Party won decisively, has rattled markets and raised concerns about his political sustainability. Compounding these challenges is a burgeoning corruption scandal involving his sister and chief-of-staff, Karina Milei. Leaked audio recordings have triggered an investigation into an alleged kickback scheme involving government contracts for disability services, which has led to public protests and damaged the administration's credibility ahead of the vote. President Milei has dismissed the allegations as a politically motivated smear campaign by the opposition "caste."
A significant factor in the election is the overt support President Milei has received from his ideological ally, U.S. President Donald Trump. The Trump administration has backed a potential financial aid package that could total US$40 billion, including a US$20 billion currency swap and efforts to facilitate private investment. However, this support has come with explicit political conditions. During a White House meeting on October 14, President Trump stated that U.S. generosity was contingent on Milei's party performing well in the midterms. He told reporters, "If he doesn’t win, we’re gone," and described the dire economic situation by saying, "Argentina is fighting for its life… They are dying." These statements have been widely interpreted as an attempt to influence the Argentine electorate.
Argentina's situation offers a cautionary tale for other developing nations, including Kenya. Both countries have a history of contentious relationships with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and have struggled with cycles of debt and austerity-driven social unrest. Argentina is currently the IMF's largest debtor. The public backlash in Argentina against spending cuts mirrors recent youth-led protests in Kenya against IMF-backed tax hikes. The challenge of implementing painful but potentially necessary fiscal reforms without losing political support is a key lesson. As noted in a September 2025 analysis, for both Kenya and Argentina, achieving economic stability is less about securing external financial packages and more about cultivating the political and institutional resilience to ensure reforms are sustainable and credible.
The outcome of Sunday's vote will therefore be watched closely not just in Buenos Aires, but in capitals from Nairobi to Washington D.C., as a barometer for the future of populist, market-driven reforms in a world grappling with economic uncertainty.